Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

The development of technology has positively impacted all generations of human beings. It is thought by some people that in the past people had more chances to become creative because of the time they had available. However, I believe that technology has really helped everyone include children to thrive in their favorite fields. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore as follows.

To begin with, it is crucial to mention the fact that nowadays children are differently developed than children in the past. This is as a result of the technology that is accessible to everyone. Having tools that are needed to encourage the creativity is one of the main factor of fast development, especially of children’s capability of being creative.For instance, people in the past did not have many alternatives available to bust their creative work. My grandmother told me that it was very hard for her to find the tools that she needed to increase her children imagination and fuel their creativity. Today, she sees how my parents use the technology to encourage us to come up with new ideas and innovations. If my grandmother have had the tools that she thought would be effectively helpful, the generation of my parents would have been even more advanced and had a different opportunities. That is why technology has an important role in boosting children’s creativity.

Secondly, young adults that have talent, but they are struggling to put it to the practice would have different options to approach their talent by using the developed high-tech products. Children who use the tools that are provided by the advanced technology would have the chance to think differently and come up with new and beautiful innovations. Actually, currently we have seen this happening. Young learners are thoroughly engaged on using the new technology as a high inspiring learning tool. For example, I have seen that my kids have completely changed after I bought them their own i-pads and instilling different creative programs. They were very happy and eager to learn new ideas, so they could come up with their own innovations. They did not need any teacher’s assistance that was another beneficial thing, which helped me to reduce my payment for tutors. It is clear that children have become more creative with the development of technology.

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04909560724 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84422772746 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509043927649 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5480404279 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.842105263 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170947651592 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617863701664 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447099718774 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122336798436 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174629506379 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
———————
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Do you agree or disagree?

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past

Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.

Technology has developed by leaps and bounds in recent years, and it has become an essential part of our society. Whatever it is business, entertainment or education, technology has greatly improved our efficiency and experience. In term of technology and children’s creativity, I believe technology has enhanced children creativity rather than lowering it compared to the past.

First of all, the applications that come hand in hand with mobile devices have helped children’s creativity development in many ways. Children love playing games, which is a fact that hasn’t ever changed. With the amazing game applications, children can easily indulge themselves in those interesting problems that require creativity to overcome. For example, my younger brother loves play his iPad. On this high-tech product he can play many inspiring games that promote his problem solving skills, such as games about escaping rooms or finding ways out of a maze. And he loves them because he can prove his smartness by beating the games. On the other hand, children in the past apparently did’t have the advantages we have. With the various apps, we can easily train kids’ brains.

Secondly, technology provides a much cheaper way for parents to help their children to develop creativity. If a father in 50 years ago wanted to let his daughter learn some drawing, a universally acknowledged creative activity, he had to hire a skilled teacher and buy many kinds of pens and pigments and papers for his daughter. If he was not wealthy then the cost would be unbearable. If a contemporary father wants to do the same thing for his daughter but he is short of money, he could buy a iPad or some other cheaper tablet to achieve the same goal. Today we can watch skilled drawer teaching in a video on internet, and there are plenty great drawing apps available too. So today, the cost of developing children’s creativity is much lower than in the past.

In a nut shell, with the great technology we have, not only it is easier for kids to be creative but also it is cheaper for parents. So technology has made children more creative than in the past.

Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past

Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.

The influence of technology has recently been the topic of debate among experts. Some people think technology improvements have a positive impact on children’s creativity. However, other people disagree with them. In my view, technology has made children less creative than they were in the past due to decreasing their social communication and quickly getting everything. I will explain my reason hereunder.
First, technology improvement makes children alone, as they spend much time stay at home and play tablets. Hence, they are less creative. For example, my cousin spends a lot of time playing online games. Consequently, he always stays home and does not communicate with other people or make friends. As a result, he never understands the issues and problems that other people or other places have. Moreover, he does not think about problems and solutions. Thus, decreasing your social community makes you less creative, as you do not face society’s problem.
Second, technology helps children to get information in each field and solve what problems they have. As a result, they do not try hard to get something themselves, and they become less creative. For example, my daughter had homework yesterday. She searched for all information on the internet, and she did not try to answer the questions herself. After two hours, she completed her homework! When I was at her age, this homework took me at least one week. I was so creative comparing to my daughter today. Thus, technology makes children get what they want without any efforts, and it makes them less creative.
In conclusion, technology makes people less creative. That is due to reducing their social communication and quickly getting everything.

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, moreover, second, so, thus, at least, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 277.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20577617329 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7857360429 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.621454397 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.6666666667 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1904761905 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326029306479 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899470218456 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12891944338 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19994877461 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122102194932 0.0645574589148 189% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.05 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

———————
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

for example, we can always apply ‘save time’, ‘save/make money’, ‘find a job’, ‘make friends’, ‘get more information’ as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply ‘waste time’, ‘waste money’, ‘no job’, ‘make bad friends’, ‘get bad information’ as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
———————
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Agree or disagree technology has made children less creative than they were in the past

Agree or disagree, technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.

It is a highly debated issue whether or not technology has made children less creative than they was in the past, and this subject can be approached from several angles due to its complexity. Some parents feel that technology help their kids to be more creative. They say that with using technology as smart phones, computers, and Tablets, kids today able to create things older than their age. I understand this point of view but I have a different opinion. I believe that technology affected negatively on our children creativities, and the following discussion reveals my stand and reasoning.

To begin with, children today depend on technology to do the work instead of them. You could scan any word in internet, and you could find unlimited information about it through the net. For instance, last week my ten years old daughter had a science project. She needed to make a model about one animal lives in the forest, and also, she needs to write a report about it. I thought such project will take at least two days to be finished, but it took from her two hours instead. She chose the Jaguar as her model, and then she searched the internet about him. She found many reports and models ready to print on internet. She printed and all done. I remember when I was in her age, For such model I used to cut and glue things together, using boxes and all left materials from the garage. I was so creative comparing to my daughter today. When I tried to explain this to her, she told me that what all other kids do nowadays, and she does exactly the same.

Second, children today have hundreds of games on their phones or tablets; they don’t feel that they need to be creative to enjoy playing anymore. For example, when I was in my daughter age, I used to have only few toys to play with. I remember that I used to have a one doll and a tea set. I used my imagination all the time when I play, the table was my castle, the ordinary large boxes would be my car. I used to draw for hours with chalks outside my home. While today, my daughter doesn’t enjoy these games; all games that she likes are computer’s games. I bought her a box of chalks few weeks ago. I beg her to drew outside and play with other kids in the neighborhood. She played for five minutes then she told me that she gets bored. I saw the other kids, who were outside too, they all holding their phones, mp3s, and none of them played natural games that we used to play when we were kids.

In conclusion, I believe that the technology destroyed our children’s imagination. The technology today does the work instead of our kids. Also, children today enjoy their time by using the technology and they don’t feel that they need to be creative anymore.