How to lose to friends and alienate people

How to Lose Friends & Alienate People

2008, Comedy, 1h 49m

What to know

critics consensus

A decent performance from Pegg in a disappointing film. Neither sharp nor satirical, Weide’s adaptation relies too heavily on slapstick, and misses the point of the source material in the process. Read critic reviews

You might also like

Where to watch

Rate And Review

Rate this movie

Oof, that was Rotten.

Meh, it passed the time.

It’s good – I’d recommend it.

So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

What did you think of the movie? (optional)

You’re almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

How did you buy your ticket?

Let’s get your review verified.

AMCTheatres.com or AMC App New

Cinemark Coming Soon

We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

Regal Coming Soon

We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

Theater box office or somewhere else

By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.

You’re almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

Rate this movie

Oof, that was Rotten.

Meh, it passed the time.

It’s good – I’d recommend it.

So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

What did you think of the movie? (optional)

How did you buy your ticket?

AMCTheatres.com or AMC App New

Cinemark Coming Soon

We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

Regal Coming Soon

We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

Theater box office or somewhere else

By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.

You haven’t finished your review yet, want to submit as-is?

You can always edit your review after.

Are you sure?

Verified reviews are considered more trustworthy by fellow moviegoers.

Want to submit changes to your review before closing?

Done Already? A few more words can help others decide if it’s worth watching

They won’t be able to see your review if you only submit your rating.

Done Already? A few more words can help others decide if it’s worth watching

They won’t be able to see your review if you only submit your rating.

The image is an example of a ticket confirmation email that AMC sent you when you purchased your ticket. Your Ticket Confirmation # is located under the header in your email that reads «Your Ticket Reservation Details». Just below that it reads «Ticket Confirmation#:» followed by a 10-digit number. This 10-digit number is your confirmation number.

Your AMC Ticket Confirmation# can be found in your order confirmation email.

How to lose friends and alienate people

News Corporation looks likely to weather the News of the World scandal. But it may end up becalmed—and lose some crew to boot

TWO weeks ago News Corporation was a corporate giant led by a legend and on the verge of the biggest deal in its history. Now the deal is off and Rupert Murdoch is widely derided. Britain’s three big political parties have ganged up on the company, along with the Church of England, every other media outlet and an array of celebrities. A once-feared colossus has become a pantomime villain, hissed from the stage.

News Corporation has been brought low by allegations that the News of the World, one of its British tabloids, paid the police for information and hacked into the voice-mail accounts of many people, some famous, some in tragic circumstances. The implications for British politics, and for the conduct and freedoms of the British press, will take a long time to play out (see article). The corporate impacts already look grievous.

Newspapers are not central to what News Corporation does (see chart 1). In the year to June 2010 they accounted for just 13% of its profits—down from more than 30% nine years earlier. The firm’s British newspaper outfit, News International, adds only crumbs to that small slice. News Group Newspapers, the subsidiary that runs the News of the World and the Sun, has gone from being substantially profitable to being marginally profitable. The Times and the Sunday Times collectively lose money (see chart 2).

But newspapers are central to who Mr Murdoch is. News Corporation executives speak with bemusement or despair of the boss’s obsession with what goes in his papers, down even to the placement of stories. They are also the source of his extensive political influence in Britain. Most British newspapers are predictably partisan. News International’s papers combine a lot of readers with a willingness to swing both ways.

If the damage from the scandal was limited to British newspapers, or even to Mr Murdoch’s reputation and political influence, it would be manageable for the company even if dire for him. It spreads beyond that. Police investigations and a public inquiry loom. News Corporation’s leadership and succession, never exactly certain, now seem decidedly wobbly. And the collapse of the bid for BSkyB, a satellite broadcaster, has wrecked a scheme intended to transform the company. News Corporation is no longer free to develop in the way it had planned to, nor necessarily under the leadership it expected.

A protester wearing a giant Rupert Murdoch mask was parading in front of the media boss’s London home this week dressed as a convict. For the man himself it surely will not come to that; for others it quite possibly will. British coppers are investigating both phone-hacking and bribery charges. They told Parliament on July 12th that they have informed 170 people out of almost 4,000 whose names appear in papers seized in 2006 from Glenn Mulcaire, a private investigator formerly employed by the News of the World. Just a small fraction of Mr Mulcaire’s prodigious workload could provide the wherewithal for a lot of criminal prosecutions and civil suits. Companies can be found guilty under Britain’s Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act if it is proved that criminal behaviour like phone-hacking took place with managers’ “consent or connivance”.

American politicians, aggrieved at claims that victims of terrorism were targeted, are calling for investigations. Some have asked the Department of Justice to consider a probe under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a broad law that targets bribes paid anywhere in the world. But Danforth Newcomb, a lawyer, points out that the law focuses on bribes paid to “obtain or retain” business: it isn’t clear whether paying police officers for information would qualify. Another reason for the Americans to stay their hands is that the British can do a perfectly good job of prosecuting bribery by themselves. A new Bribery Act came into force on July 1st.

A judicial inquiry into phone-hacking could also do a lot of damage. High-profile public inquiries punch far above their legal weight: they often lead to resignations. This one seems likely to show that both News International and News Corporation made a poor fist of investigating the wrongdoing at the News of the World. An internal investigation of e-mails was carried out in 2007, following the convictions of Clive Goodman, the paper’s royal editor, and Mr Mulcaire. Executives later told Parliament they had found nothing to suggest phone-hacking had been widespread. The company’s e-mails did, however, apparently contain evidence that bribes had been paid to police officers.

The Guardian, another British paper, reported that News International had settled cases brought by several people who had threatened to sue for having their phones hacked. James Murdoch, who had been running BSkyB when the alleged phone-hacking took place but was subsequently put in charge of the newspaper business, approved some payments. He said on July 7th that he was not fully aware of the facts when he did so. That action could be probed by the public inquiry. So could the firm’s persistent failure to clean house.

Other newspapers soon alleged that former News of the World reporters had described widespread phone-hacking at the paper. News International reacted angrily. Rebekah Brooks, once editor of the News of the World and by then chief executive of News International, said the Guardian had “substantially and likely deliberately misled the British public”. Bill Akass, the News of the World‘s managing editor, complained that a New York Times investigation “was motivated, at least in part, by the desire to harm a competitor” (the Wall Street Journal, acquired by News Corporation in 2007, had declared war on the New York Times). None of that looks good now.

Couldn’t happen to a nicer company

One of the distinguishing features of News Corporation is aggression. The firm combines the heft of a big company with the scrappiness of a start-up. Even more than at other media firms, executives sometimes seem inspired by Machiavelli—or Richard III. Competitors are to be crushed. Executives in other companies that take an opposite view on strategic questions are idiots. In 2009 the usually cerebral James Murdoch launched a scathing attack on the BBC, whose size and zeal for expansion into new areas he described as “chilling”.

This take-no-prisoners approach makes the company extremely bold. It was News Corporation that broached the possibility of releasing films early on pay-television—a move that still enrages cinema owners. Together with the Financial Times (part-owner of this newspaper) it has led the charge to demand money for newspapers on the web. In America the firm drives a particularly hard bargain over payments from cable and satellite carriers for its broadcast network. BSkyB is a similarly brutal negotiator.

Unfortunately, this attitude earns the company enemies as well as revenues. Over the years News Corporation has offended governments and regulators. Its aggression and sheer size terrify rival media firms. In October 2010 the BBC and the owners of the Daily Mail, the Daily Telegraph, the Daily Mirror and the Guardian newspapers signed a letter opposing its bid to take complete control of BSkyB, in which it now has a 39% stake. Part of the reason News Corporation has handled the phone-hacking crisis so badly is that it tends to view hostile reporting as motivated by rivalry.

As the company braces for further embarrassment and disruption, it will also have to work out a future without BSkyB. Public and political opinion have become so hostile that the government may refuse to sign off on any attempt to renew the bid, even at the risk of a judicial review. This makes the transition News Corporation wants to make to a new, eventually post-Rupert world a lot harder.

The Murdoch discount

Even investors well-disposed to Mr Murdoch call him a “deal junkie” and speak of a “Murdoch discount” to the share price. Analysts who like the company tend to focus not on Mr Murdoch but on the executives he appoints. Before he left the firm in 2009, the main object of investors’ ardour was its president, Peter Chernin. They now point to Chase Carey, a satellite-television veteran. They warm to the company in direct proportion to the rising power of such men, and in inverse proportion to the amount of cash Mr Murdoch has at his disposal to pursue deals.

In a sense there are two overlapping News Corporations. The first, better-known, one is swashbuckling, acquisitive and politically connected; its figurehead is Mr Murdoch. Newspapers belong to this part of the company, which is why their losses are indulged. The second News Corporation is strategic and hard-nosed, bordering on stingy. In Hollywood, for example, the firm is legendary (and resented) for driving down actors’ prices and for pioneering a rigorous, marketing-led approach to film-making.

James Murdoch, until recently the most plausible heir, belongs to the second News Corporation. Although he likes newspapers, he likes a good business more—and pay-television is a good business, as he demonstrated during a successful spell running BSkyB. He tends to think of newspapers as akin to pay-television outfits. Get the pricing right; increase revenues by selling other products to readers; in future, perhaps, bundle newspapers like pay-TV channels. Their reach and their influence are less important.

A twist on the old model

The BSkyB deal was crucial to News Corporation not just because it would make the company far more profitable. It would have allowed the firm to create a kind of European Sky, with BSkyB, Sky Deutschland and Sky Italia sharing set-top box technology and bidding collectively for sport and movies. Most important, it would have confirmed that the second, less inky, version of News Corporation was here to stay, the culture change accomplished by a young Murdoch who would thereby have proved his ability to lead. The Murdoch discount might, in time, even have turned into a Murdoch premium.

Now News Corporation has become stuck mid-metamorphosis. The old, newspaper-oriented company has stymied the new one. The young man who was attempting to lead the company’s transformation has been tarnished. Where does the firm go from here?

Its first priority will be to shore up its share price, which has taken a battering over the past week. News Corporation has already announced it will accelerate a buy-back of shares, beginning next month. It may devote more money to that. Such a move will probably mollify shareholders who have complained about mismanagement at the company. Few buy shares in News Corporation in the belief they can profoundly steer the company.

The cash pile will quickly build up again. Channels like National Geographic are riding the rising tide of pay-TV adoption in emerging markets. American TV advertising, which has bounced back strongly from the recession, will rise higher as politicians begin to pour money into 30-second spots attacking their opponents. The Fox News Channel, which is already hugely profitable, will draw conservatives eager for more heated predictions of Barack Obama’s downfall. Before (if ever) returning to BSkyB, News Corporation could make a run at a cable television network. AMC, best known for “Mad Men”, recently became available, although the bidding for it is likely to be fierce.

One of the great media parlour games consists of trying to predict when Mr Murdoch will step down from running the company he founded. Some thought he was on the verge of leaving 20 years ago. The media industry’s last true mogul has been wounded by the News of the World scandal, and News Corporation has been thrown off course. But, oddly, it has become even harder to imagine the company carrying on without him.

This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline «How to lose friends and alienate people»

How to Lose Friends and Alienate People

Send any friend a story

As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.

Give this article

By Richard Lingeman

SUCCESS is the great American secular religion, a «drama of economic salvation,» as the historian Irvin G. Wyllie writes in «The Self-Made Man in America.» The gospel of success, as propagated over the years by authors of hundreds of inspirational books, beginning with Ben Franklin, promises salvation (wealth) through faith (ambition, perseverance) and good works (industry, frugality). Among the sturdiest toilers in the vineyard of evangelical materialism was Napoleon Hill, author of «Law of Success» (1928), «Think and Grow Rich!» (1937), «The Magic Ladder to Success» (1930) and other improving books.

Hill’s biography has now been written by Michael J. Ritt Jr., executive director of the Napoleon Hill Foundation, and Kirk Landers, a journalist and freelance business writer.

Given Mr. Ritt’s ties to the Hill legacy (the Prophet died in 1970 at the age of 87), this is hardly an objective account, and, as befitting the quasi-religious overtones of the subject, the prose at times acquires the pious inflections of a Life of a Saint. But credit the authors with candidly demonstrating that Hill was no such thing.

In his unpublished autobiography, on which the authors heavily rely, Hill accorded himself a classic Horatio Alger boyhood. He was born in 1883 in the uplands of Wise County, Va., to a family that represented, he said, three generations of «ignorance, illiteracy and poverty.» But in fact Hill’s grandfather was a printer; his father became a self-taught dentist and treated his neighbors until the state licensing authorities got wind of his activities. He then enrolled in dental school at the age of 40 and went on to practice legally. Hill’s stepmother, the widow of a school principal, civilized the wild-child Napoleon, making him go to school and attend church. She also bought him a typewriter, and with it he wrote up news items for rural newspapers. Thus emerged a talent for writing that he would later apply to exhorting Americans to get rich.

Fresh out of commercial college, Hill talked himself into a job with a prominent lawyer. One weekend, the manager at a coal mine the lawyer owned got drunk and became involved in the accidental shooting of a black bellhop. With the boss away, Hill took charge, arranging to have the death covered up. As a reward, his employer made him manager of the mine at the age of only 19.

So far so good, Horatio. But Hill had congenitally itchy feet; he abandoned the mines for law school, supporting himself by composing profiles of successful people for an inspirational magazine. Unable to earn enough to pay for his law course, he moved to Washington as the magazine’s correspondent and wangled an audience with Andrew Carnegie, who, according to Hill, took a shine to him and planted with him the idea that changed his life. The steel magnate told him to interview the wealthiest men in America and assemble the secrets of their success in a book, which would be «one of the most enlightening documents ever written.» Carnegie cannily did not offer to finance the project, telling Hill that «the rewards from this labor would be far in excess of any payment he might offer,» but he did provide him with letters of introduction to fellow tycoons. And so, Hill later wrote, «the Hand of Destiny reached out to me.»

This sounds a bit too inspiring to be true. Nor was Carnegie’s advice all that original. Compendiums of interviews with great industrialists revealing the secrets of their rise were a staple of success literature. Nevertheless, Hill devoted his spare time for the next 20 years to researching the «laws» of success.

As fast as the money rolled in, he spent it, purchasing fine clothes, a Rolls-Royce and a 600-acre Xanadu in the Catskills, where he planned to establish «the world’s first University-sized Success School.» Unfortunately, the year was 1929, and eight-volume sermons on how to make millions would, as the Depression deepened, seem in bad taste. Royalties dried up, takers for his syndicated success column dwindled and the owner foreclosed on Xanadu.

Unbowed, Hill scrabbled a living by promoting his «Mental Dynamite» lecture series and editing and writing Inspiration Magazine. Through a Congressman friend, he got a job turning out public-relations materials for the Government. Hill claimed that he became a confidant of F. D. R. himself. Maybe so, but I somehow doubt that Hill coined the remark «The only thing we have to fear is fear itself,» as he asserted, though he was a prosperity-around-the-corner guy who believed that curing the Depression was a matter of restoring confidence. Macroeconomics has never been the strong suit of apostles of individualism.

In his remaining years Hill advised companies with «labor troubles» (union organizers), married a good woman and buckled down to merchandising his books and success courses, with the backing of a wealthy disciple, the insurance executive W. Clement Stone, who made the Master’s books required reading for his agents. From Hill’s inspiring life I have gleaned another Law of Success: Don’t waste your time chasing a rainbow. Package it and sell it to others. Then you’ll find a pot of gold.

Как потерять друзей и заставить всех тебя ненавидеть (фильм, 2008 )

How to Lose Friends & Alienate People

О фильме

В кадре

Маргинальный журналист Сидни Янг является на вечеринку Британской киноакадемии со свиньей. Там его замечает главный редактор американского гламурного журнала Sharps и, ностальгируя по собственной бурной молодости, зовет к себе на работу. Янг, одновременно ненавидящий знаменитостей и мечтающий быть как они, едет покорять Нью-Йорк. Провал следует за провалом, но британец так легко не сдастся.

За кадром

Фильм основал на одноименных мемуарах британского журналиста Тоби Янга, который умудрился проработать в Vanity Fair пять лет, хотя каждый день оказывался на грани увольнения. Название книги пародирует бестселлер Дэйла Карнеги «Как завоевывать друзей и влиять на людей» /How to Win Friends and Influence People/.

Во время съемок ленты Янгу запретили появляться на площадке: он достал режиссера и актеров тем, что постоянно лез с советами и мешал работать.

По словам самого Янга, вначале его должен был сыграть Орландо Блум. Хотя, вероятно, он шутит.

Цитаты

«Мне не нравится говорить тебе это, но ты только в первой комнате. Это не плохо, не пойми меня неправильно, но это и не круто. Через год, может позже, ты обнаружишь секретную дверь в глубине комнаты. Она ведет во вторую. Со временем, если тебе повезет, ты найдешь дверь в третью комнату. Всего семь комнат. Ты в первой. Я в седьмой. Не забывай об этом» – «Могу я пользоваться туалетом в седьмой, потому что в том, который в первой, жутко воняет?»

«Это Нью-Йорк, Сидни. Женщины здесь встречаются только с успешными мужчинами». – «Я стану успешным». – «И высокими».

«Я не знаю значения слова страх». – «Я уверена, ты не знаешь значения многих слов».

«Все, что я умею делать, – выводить людей из себя». (из фильма)

«Сценарист на площадке – как отец в палате во время родов, а я только написал книгу, так что я как приятель отца в палате во время родов». (Тоби Янг)

«Люди, которые знали Янга, спрашивали меня: как вы собираетесь сделать его симпатичным в фильме, который люди будут смотреть на протяжении двух часов? И мой ответ был прост: Саймон Пегг». (режиссер Роберт Б. Уэйд)

How to Lose Friends and Alienate People Soundtrack [ 2008 ]

List of Songs

playing in background while phone is ringing

What A Wonderful World

Sidney arrives in New York and drives in a taxi

The Midway State

Song in the background at the bar where Sidney spills wine on Alisons book.

Song when Sidny goes dancing at a club after arriving at his apartment.

Sidney puts this record on when Bobbie asks him to put something more romantic on

Sidney dances with the girl he picked up at the bar back at his apartment

after Sidney recieves a voicemail message from his father, then goes for a ride in a cab through NYC

background music while Sidney is getting an autograph]

Sidney tells them the greatest film ever made, ‘Con Air’

La dolce vita (From «La dolce vita»)

when Sophie is wading through the pool

Heavy Like Sunday

As Sidney leaves the bar, after talking with Alison. He takes his goldfish

Sidney gets a stripper for Lawrence

What Good Is Heaven

while Sidney is driving Alison home

The 2 Live Crew

Alison plays this song, and says she loves it

I Don’t Feel Like Dancing

played during the costume party

The Drinks Taste Better When They’re Free

After Alison tells Sidney shes back with Lawrence, Sidney is sitting at the bar

For Unknown Reason

Sidney makes it to the next room, and does a profile on Vincent

With Every Heartbeat (feat. Kleerup)

Sophie and Sidney arrive at the club from the limo

I Love What You Do

Sidney is dancing with a blonde girl and then Sophie on the dancefloo

Time to Pretend

Sidney tries to cross the balcony, 20 floors up

Now and Forever

Harry Parr-Davies and Christopher Hassal

Sophie arrives at the Apollo awards

Sidney is waiting at the airport, his ring in his hand

You Really Got Me

The book starts to burn. End Credits start

James Brett and Rupert Christie

Add scene description

Get On The Floor

The Ironweed Project

Add scene description

Soundtracks

No soundtracks are currently available for this title

Trailer Songs

Oh no! No trailer songs have been added yet. Add them by logging in.

Comments

C’mon, there’s no such thing as a stupid question. Get the ball rolling and be the first.

Movie Info

Contributors

WhatSong is the worlds largest collection of movie & tv show soundtracks and playlists.

© 2022 WhatSong Soundtracks. All rights reserved